Ipswich MP, Sandy Martin took the opportunity in yesterday's debate on rail franchising to raise concerns about the removal of guards from local train services.
He also pointed out that many of our privatized train services are not privatized at all, but run by nationalized companies of foreign governments.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Sandy said: "In my region, Abellio is running some trains with guards and some without. It is using its plans to introduce new trains in East Anglia as an excuse for threatening to remove guards’ ability to supervise the closing of the doors. I have a great fear that my constituents’ travel needs will be sacrificed on the altar of the rail operator’s intransigence. Abellio is quite capable of running brand new, safe and viable trains with guards who fully supervise the train, including by closing the doors. It can do that in Scotland and do it in the Netherlands.
"The Conservatives say that our train operators are better than they would be if they were state owned, but many of our train operators are state owned — just not by this state. Dutch democratic decision takers believe that passengers in their country deserve rail services that involve guards ensuring the safe closure of doors, but here in England, Abellio is awarded a franchise that is based on the removal of that safety measure, and once the franchise is awarded, the Government claim that any disruption caused by industrial action is nothing to do with them. The franchising system reduces every decision to what the train operator can afford to do within the franchise it has agreed. I want a railway based on the best interests of passengers and of our country."